Last week, a Northern District of Illinois court decision reinforced several key ERISA litigation principles relevant to health plan sponsors and carriers.

While state law claims were dismissed as preempted, the court allowed the plaintiff’s §502(a)(1)(B) claim to proceed and declined to dismiss based on failure to exhaust administrative remedies.

The court emphasized that exhaustion is an affirmative defense and found that, based on the plan’s communications, the plaintiff plausibly alleged that the administrative process had been represented as complete. Critically, the issue centered on inaccurate or inconsistent communications during the appeals process, which could mislead a participant about available appeal rights.

This decision affects ERISA employee welfare plans and highlights the importance of ensuring carriers and TPAs are providing clear, accurate, and consistent claims and appeal communications, as defects in those communications may undermine exhaustion defenses and increase litigation risk.

Read the full memorandum

^{While every effort has been taken in compiling this information to ensure that its contents are totally accurate, neither the publisher nor the author can accept liability for any inaccuracies or changed circumstances of any information herein or for the consequences of any reliance placed upon it. This publication is distributed on the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering legal, accounting, or other professional advice or services. Readers should always seek professional advice before entering into any commitments.}