The Affordable Care Act (ACA) requires applicable large employers (ALEs) to offer affordable, minimum-value (MV) health coverage to their full-time employees (FTEs) or risk paying a penalty. This employer mandate provision is known as the “employer shared responsibility” or “pay-or-play” rules. An ALE is only liable for a penalty if one or more of its FTEs receive a premium tax credit (PTC) to pay for health insurance through an ACA Exchange (or Marketplace).

Employers should be aware of the following changes related to the ACA's pay-or-play rules for 2027:

• An ALE's health coverage is considered affordable for FTEs if their required contribution for self-only coverage does not exceed 10.22% of their household income for the year (up from 9.96% for 2026); and
• Pay-or-play penalty amounts increase. For example, ALEs assessed with penalties because their coverage is unaffordable may be charged a monthly penalty of $472.50 for each FTE who receives a PTC (up from $417.50 for 2026)

Action Items

ALEs should review the pay-or-play changes for 2027 in advance of the upcoming plan year. The increase in penalty amounts may make it more important than ever for an ALE to offer affordable and MV health coverage to its FTEs.

Affordability Percentage Increases for 2027

The affordability of health coverage is a key point in determining whether an ALE may be subject to a penalty. Individuals who are eligible for employer-sponsored coverage that is affordable and provides MV are not eligible for a PTC. For purposes of the pay-or-play rules, the affordability test applies only to the portion of the annual premiums for self-only coverage and does not include any additional cost for family coverage. Also, if an employer offers multiple health coverage options, the affordability test applies to the lowest-cost option that provides MV.

Because an employer generally will not know an employee's household income, the IRS has provided three optional affordability safe harbors that ALEs may use to determine affordability based on information that is available to them: the federal poverty level (FPL) safe harbor, the rate-of-pay safe harbor and the Form W-2 safe harbor.

The affordability increase to 10.22% potentially allows employers to charge a higher amount for health coverage while still avoiding penalties. The new percentage has the following impact on the affordability safe harbors for 2027:

• FPL safe harbor: Coverage is considered affordable if the employee's contribution for self-only coverage does not exceed 10.22% of the FPL for a single individual for the applicable calendar year, which equals approximately $135.93 per month for calendar-year health plans (up from $129.90 per month in 2026);
• Rate-of-pay safe harbor: Coverage is considered affordable if the employee's monthly contribution for self-only coverage does not exceed 10.22% of monthly wages. For hourly employees, monthly wages are calculated by multiplying the hourly rate by 130. For an employee earning $20 per hour, this equals approximately $265.72 per month (up from $258.96 in 2026); and
• Form W-2 safe harbor: Coverage is considered affordable if the employee's contribution for self-only coverage does not exceed 10.22% of the employee’s W-2 wages from the employer for that year. For an employee earning $45,000 per year, this equals approximately $383.25 per month (up from $373.50 in 2026)

Pay-or-Play Penalties Increase for 2027

An ALE may be subject to a pay-or-play penalty if at least one FTE receives a PTC for purchasing health insurance through an Exchange and the ALE:

• Did not offer health plan coverage to “substantially all” (generally, at least 95%) of FTEs and their dependents;
• Offered health plan coverage to substantially all FTEs but not to the specific FTE receiving the credit; or
• Offered health plan coverage to FTEs that was unaffordable or did not provide MV

There are two types of penalties that can apply to ALEs under the pay-or-play rules: the Section 4980H(a) penalty and the Section 4980H(b) penalty. These penalty amounts are adjusted for inflation each year.

They are calculated as follows:

1. Section 4980H(a) penalties: An ALE will be subject to a Section 4980H(a) penalty if it does not offer coverage to substantially all its FTEs (and dependents) and any one of its FTEs receives a PTC toward their Exchange plan. This monthly penalty is equal to the ALE's number of FTEs (minus 30) multiplied by one-twelfth of $2,000 for any applicable month. The $2,000 penalty amount is adjusted for inflation each year. For 2027, the penalty increases to $3,780 (up from $3,340 for 2026); and
2. Section 4980H(b) penalties: ALEs that offer coverage to substantially all FTEs (and dependents) may still be subject to a Section 4980H(b) penalty if at least one FTE obtains a PTC through an Exchange because the ALE did not offer coverage to all FTEs, or the ALE's coverage is unaffordable or does not provide MV. The monthly penalty assessed on an ALE for each FTE who receives a PTC is one-twelfth of $3,000 for any applicable month. However, the total penalty for an ALE is limited to the 4980H(a) penalty amount. The $3,000 penalty amount is adjusted for inflation each year. For 2027, the penalty increases to $5,670 (up from $5,010 for 2026)

For 2027, ALEs assessed with Section 4980H(a) penalties may be charged a monthly penalty of approximately $315 per FTE (minus a 30-employee reduction), up from $278.33 for 2026.

ALEs assessed with Section 4980H(b) penalties may be charged a monthly penalty of approximately $472.50 for each FTE who receives a PTC for Exchange coverage, up from $417.50 for 2026.

Resources

• Amwins Compliance Library - Affordability and Minimum Value
• Amwins Compliance Library - Employer Shared Responsibility Provision
• 2027 Penalties for Employers Not Offering Affordable Coverage
• 2027 Potential Penalty Play or Pay

^{While every effort has been taken in compiling this information to ensure that its contents are totally accurate, neither the publisher nor the author can accept liability for any inaccuracies or changed circumstances of any information herein or for the consequences of any reliance placed upon it. This publication is distributed on the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering legal, accounting, or other professional advice or services. Readers should always seek professional advice before entering into any commitments.}